Others’ participation rate influences an individual’s charitable behavior: Others’ similarity as a moderator

Keywords:
charitable behavior, similarity, others’ participation, diffusion of responsibility
Abstract

We proposed that a moderator, others’ similarity, would determine the impact of high participation rates of others on an individual’s charitable behavior, and aimed to show that this moderator would work through the diffusion of responsibility motive. Participants (N = 152 undergraduate students) completed measures of charitable behavior and diffusion of responsibility, after being assigned to 1 of 2 conditions where a set percentage of other students (manipulated as either similar undergraduate students or dissimilar graduate students) were stated to have already donated to a charitable campaign (high contribution condition = 70% participation, low contribution condition = 30% participation). Our results showed that the high participation rate of others increased an individual’s charitable behavior when the others in question were similar to that individual, but not when the others were dissimilar. In addition, the high rate of participation by others increased the diffusion of responsibility motive when the others in question were dissimilar to that individual, leading to a negative effect on that individual’s charitable behavior.

Author Biographies
  1. Seung Yun Lee, Konkuk University

    College of Business

  2. Sunho Jung, Kyung Hee University
    School of Management
  3. Sangdo Oh, Yonsei University
    College of Government and Business
  4. Seong Hoon Park, SK Corporate Contribution Team, Republic of Korea
    School of Business
References
Downloads
Published
2017-04-05
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.