Mindfulness and suicidal ideation in Chinese older adults: Perceived stress as mediator

Authors
  • Weinan Zeng

    Guangdong Medical University

  • Zewei Ma

    Guangdong Medical University

  • Hezhan Li

    Guangdong Medical University

Keywords:
mindfulness, perceived stress, suicidal ideation, Chinese older adults
Abstract

We examined whether or not perceived stress mediates the relationship between mindfulness and suicidal ideation in Chinese older adults. Chinese adults aged from 48 to 59 years (N = 213) completed the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, the Perceived Stress Scale, and the first two items of the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised. Results showed that mindfulness was negatively correlated with perceived stress and suicidal ideation, whereas perceived stress was positively correlated with suicidal ideation. Mediation analysis results suggested that perceived stress fully mediated the relationship between mindfulness and suicidal ideation in Chinese older adults. Therefore, we suggest that it is helpful to focus on the enhancement of mindfulness of older adults, because their perceived stress levels may be decreased by greater mindfulness. It is plausible that older adults would then be less likely to develop severe suicidal ideation.

Author Biographies
  1. Weinan Zeng, Guangdong Medical University

    School of Humanities and Management, Research Center on Quality of Life and Applied Psychology

  2. Zewei Ma, Guangdong Medical University

    School of Humanities and Management, Research Center on Quality of Life and Applied Psychology

  3. Hezhan Li, Guangdong Medical University

    School of Humanities and Management, Research Center on Quality of Life and Applied Psychology

References
Downloads
Published
2016-06-27
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.