Ambivalent attitude of young people in China toward rich kids: Evidence from behavioral indices

Authors
  • Dai Cui

    Chinese Academy of Science

  • Lili Wu

    Chinese Academy of Science

  • Jianxin Zhang

    Chinese Academy of Science

Keywords:
ambivalent attitude, rich kids, cognitive evaluation, emotion, young people
Abstract

A social phenomenon of great interest in China is that of young people who have rich parents, commonly referred to as “rich kids.” These rich kids are both liked and disliked by other young people, leading to contradictions in the behavior of their peers toward the rich kids. We conducted 2 studies to examine the attitude that young people hold toward rich kids from an ambivalent theory perspective. In Study 1, we used a free-thinking task and found that participants were ambivalent, associating both good and bad things with the target phrase “rich kids.” In Study 2, we presented participants with a scenario. Participants showed a more negative evaluation of, and more ambivalent emotions toward, the target they were supposed to meet when they were told that the target was a rich kid. These results showed that the participants’ attitudinal ambivalence manifested in their emotion but not in their cognitive evaluation.

Author Biographies
  1. Dai Cui, Chinese Academy of Science
    Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology
  2. Lili Wu, Chinese Academy of Science
    Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology
  3. Jianxin Zhang, Chinese Academy of Science
    Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology
References
Downloads
Published
2015-05-05
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.