Effects of review characteristics and consumer regulatory focus on perceived review usefulness
- Keywords:
- consumer reviews, regulatory focus, review valence, review claim type, perceived usefulness
- Abstract
-
Employing regulatory focus theory, we explored how consumer regulatory focus interacts with 2 characteristics of a consumer review—review valence and claim type—to influence consumers’ perceived usefulness of the review. To this end, we conducted an experiment with 126 college students as participants. The results showed that promotion-focused consumers perceived a positive review to be more useful than did prevention-focused consumers, whereas prevention-focused consumers perceived a negative review as more useful than did promotion-focused consumers. We also found that promotion-focused consumers perceived an evaluative review as more useful than did prevention-focused consumers. Unexpectedly, however, both promotion- and prevention-focused consumers perceived a factual review to be highly useful.
- Author Biographies
- References
- Downloads
- Published
- 2015-06-01
- Issue
- Vol. 43 No. 8 (2015)
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.
Disclaimer
Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.