Measurement of bullying in the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study 2021 cohort: Evidence for model misspecification

Authors
  • Georgios Sideridis

    Institutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School

  • Mohammed Alghamdi

    Department of Self-Development Skills, King Saud University

Keywords:
bullying, item response theory, graded response model, Rasch model, generalized partial-credit model, two-parameter logistic model, model misspecification
Abstract

We evaluated the use of the Rasch model in the scoring and scaling of the context questionnaire scales from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study 2021 cohort. Focusing on the bullying scale of the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study, we contrasted polytomous item response theory models using free (two-parameter logistic modeling) and fixed (Rasch modeling) discrimination parameters. Our analyses included data from 354,074 students from 63 countries or entities. Across all countries and entities, the Rasch-based model significantly distorted levels of bullying. The rank ordering of countries was consistent between models in 32 of the cases (50.8%), while in other cases there were changes in rank of up to five places. This study provides a robust basis for evidence-based decisions on whether a country is lagging or exceeding the global norm in aberrant behaviors such as bullying.

References
Published
2024-08-07
Section
Articles
License

Copyright (c) 2024 Social Behavior and Personality

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.