A self-enhancement model of impostor thoughts at work

Authors
  • Wenlong Tang

    School of Business Administration, Huaqiao University

  • Xuan Zheng

    College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, People's Republic of China, and Graduate School of Business and Law, RMIT University

  • Rui Sun

    School of Business Administration, Huaqiao University

Keywords:
impostor thoughts, prosocial motivation, interpersonal helping, prevention focus, self-enhancement
Abstract

Workplace impostor thoughts arise from the perception that others overestimate one’s competence at work. Previous research has demonstrated the negative consequences of holding impostor thoughts at work, yet theory and research suggest it is also possible to benefit from such thoughts. Drawing on self-enhancement theory, we proposed and tested a conceptual model to account for the potentially positive impact of impostor thoughts on interpersonal helping via prosocial motivation. We proposed that one’s level of prevention focus would moderate this relationship chain, such that the positive relationships would be more pronounced when one has a lower (vs. higher) prevention focus. Findings from a multiwave, multisource field survey we conducted with 286 Chinese employees and their paired colleagues supported these hypotheses. Our study challenges the notion that imposter thoughts are uniformly detrimental and reveals pathways through which a beneficial effect on interpersonal helping may occur.

References
Published
2024-08-07
Section
Articles
License

Copyright (c) 2024 Social Behavior and Personality

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.