Influence of stress on athletes’ intuitive moral judgments in sports: The moderating role of self-control
- Authors
-
-
Ye Zhang
Institute of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University
-
Haiying Quan
Institute of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University
-
Yiming Bao
School of Statistics and Mathematics, Shandong University of Finance and Economics
-
Boqian Sun
Institute of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University
-
- Keywords:
- sports, athletes, intuitive moral judgment, stress, self-control, sports morality
- Abstract
-
We conducted two experiments to explore whether moral judgments occur intuitively in sports scenarios, and whether such judgments are influenced by stress and self-control. In Experiment 1 we verified the existence of intuitive moral judgment in sports scenarios, then in Experiment 2 we identified the moderating effect of self-control. Results of a survey with Chinese collegiate athletes showed that under the condition of low stress, there was no significant difference between individuals with strong and weak self-control regarding the accuracy rate of intuitive moral judgment in sports scenarios. Under the condition of high stress, however, individuals with strong self-control were more inclined than were those with weak self-control to intuitively make a judgment that was moral in sports scenarios. Therefore, in sports scenarios stress exerts an influence on intuitive moral judgment, and the degree to which this influence applies is moderated by individual self-control. This finding has positive implications for reducing unethical behavior among athletes in sporting contexts.
- References
- Downloads
- Published
- 2024-05-01
- Issue
- Vol. 52 No. 5 (2024)
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.
Disclaimer
Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.