Employees’ perception of corporate social responsibility and turnover intention: Work meaningfulness and affective commitment as mediators
- Authors
-
-
Xin Chen
School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University
-
Eric Hansen
Department of Wood Science and Engineering, Oregon State University
-
Jianfeng Cai
School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University
-
- Keywords:
- perceived corporate social responsibility, work meaningfulness, affective commitment, turnover intention
- Abstract
-
Although empirical research has explored the relationship of perceived corporate social responsibility with turnover intention, how the connection develops and the internal mechanism of this link require further exploration. In this study we examined the mediating roles of work meaningfulness and affective commitment in the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and turnover intention. Employees (N = 802) from real estate and manufacturing firms in China completed an online survey. The study model was assessed by structural equation modeling. Results indicated that a positive perception of corporate social responsibility indirectly and negatively affected employees’ turnover intention. The mediating roles of work meaningfulness and affective commitment in the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and turnover intention were supported. This study provides managers with new insights regarding the value of employees’ perception of the organization’s corporate social responsibility, which can play a significant role as a future employee governance tool.
- References
- Downloads
- Published
- 2023-04-05
- Issue
- Vol. 51 No. 4 (2023)
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.
Disclaimer
Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.