Mechanisms underlying the effect of occupational stressors on public servants’ organizational citizenship behavior

Authors
  • Zonghe Zhang

    Department of Public Affairs, Law School, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics

  • Guangyu Liu

    Bartlett School of Planning, University College London

  • Chao Ye

    Department of Public Affairs, Law School, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics

Keywords:
organizational citizenship behavior, public service motivation, Chinese public sector, occupational stressors, extrarole behavior, perceived organizational support
Abstract

We explored the effect of stimulating organizational citizenship behavior from the perspective of occupational stressors, as well as the roles of employees’ perceived organizational support and public service motivation as a mediator and moderator, respectively, of this relationship. Participants were 257 public servants in China, who completed questionnaires assessing the variables of interest. Results of structural equation modeling revealed that challenge stressors positively affected organizational citizenship behavior, whereas hindrance stressors negatively affected organizational citizenship behavior. Public service motivation mediated the relationship between the two forms of occupational stressors (challenge and hindrance) and organizational citizenship behavior. Additionally, perceived organizational support positively moderated the direct and indirect effects of challenge stressors on public service motivation, and also negatively moderated the direct and indirect effect of hindrance stressors on public service motivation. This research has theoretical and practical meaning for management in the Chinese public sector.

References
Published
2023-01-28
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.