Employment stress as a moderator of the relationship between proactive personality and career decision-making self-efficacy
- Authors
-
-
Shuyi Zhou
South China Vocational Education Research Centre, South China Normal University, and Dongguan Science & Technology School
-
-
-
-
-
- Keywords:
- proactive personality, career decision-making self-efficacy, employment stress, career planning, COVID-19 pandemic, Chinese graduates
- Abstract
-
We investigated the moderating role of employment stress in the relationship between proactive personality and career decision-making self-efficacy among recent Chinese graduates during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main results are as follows: (a) proactive personality positively predicted career decision-making self-efficacy, (b) employment stress was negatively related to proactive personality and career decision-making self-efficacy, and (c) employment stress significantly and negatively moderated the effect of proactive personality on career decision-making self-efficacy, meaning that the moderating effect was stronger at a lower level of employment stress. The results indicate that students graduating during the COVID-19 pandemic are more prone to suffering from complex career decision-making processes exacerbated by a challenging and changing labor market. Our findings suggest that graduates should secure flexible employment options and that officials, staff, and managers in governments, universities, and industries should work together to enhance graduates’ career decision-making self-efficacy and assist them in achieving their early career aspirations by alleviating internal and external employment pressure.
- Author Biographies
- References
- Downloads
- Published
- 2021-07-27
- Issue
- Vol. 49 No. 10 (2021)
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.
Disclaimer
Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.