Learning contextual factors, student engagement, and problem-solving skills: A Chinese perspective
- Authors
-
-
-
-
Jinlan Liu
College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, and Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
-
-
-
- Keywords:
- learning contextual factors, problem-solving skills, intellectual engagement, higher order learning, student engagement, constructive feedback
- Abstract
-
Although problem-solving skills are considered as key higher order cognitive skills, in the Chinese learning context there are gaps in the literature regarding more comprehensive examinations of which factors are likely to promote university students’ creative problem-solving skills. We explored the relationships of the learning contextual factors of higher order learning and effective teaching practices with student rule-oriented, procedural, and intellectual engagement, and the students’ problem-solving skills. Participants were 21,584 junior undergraduate students at 10 Chinese universities. Findings indicate that (a) effective teaching practices were the most important determinants in formulating students’ problem-solving skills, (b) higher order learning was the strongest predictor of student engagement, and (c) student engagement components mediated the relationship between learning contextual factors and the development of problem-solving skills. The results of an importance–performance map analysis revealed that teachers’ constructive feedback to students was a specific weakness in current Chinese teaching practices. Therefore, teachers need to provide students with more timely and facilitative feedback on their academic performance.
- Author Biographies
- References
- Downloads
- Published
- 2020-12-03
- Issue
- Vol. 49 No. 2 (2021)
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.
Disclaimer
Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.