Visionary leadership effectiveness: Moderating roles of power distance and middle-way thinking

Keywords:
visionary leadership, transformational leadership, middle-way thinking, power distance orientation, organizational citizenship behavior, leadership effectiveness, leader–follower relationship
Abstract

In existing studies on leader effectiveness, scholars have focused on the significance of the power distance orientation of followers for transformational leadership. In this study we identified middle-way thinking as a critical contingency for the effectiveness of leaders in China that reflects idiosyncratic Chinese values. Participants were 304 Chinese employees and their supervisors. Multilevel modeling revealed that middle-way thinking of followers accentuated the positive effect of visionary leadership, the core component of transformational leadership, on the organizational citizenship behavior of followers. The results also indicate that the power distance orientation of followers had a relatively limited moderating effect on the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and visionary leadership. In the context of Chinese organizations, our findings provide insight into the emic middle-way thinking of followers as a meaningful contingency that affects the effectiveness of leadership.

Author Biographies
  1. Yuan Jing Luo, Wuhan University
    Research Center for Human Resource Management
  2. Yan Ping Li, Wuhan University
    Research Center for Human Resource Management
  3. Jin Nam Choi, Seoul National University
    College of Business Administration
  4. Jing Du, Wuhan University
    Research Center for Human Resource Management
References
Published
2020-10-20
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.