Moderating role of hope in the relationship between perceived discrimination and life satisfaction among left-behind children in China

Keywords:
perceived discrimination, hope, life satisfaction, left-behind children, mental health, well-being
Abstract

We examined the moderating role of hope in the relationship between perceived discrimination and life satisfaction among left-behind children in China. Participants were 588 left-behind pupils at three rural primary schools, who completed the Children’s Hope Scale, the Perceived Discrimination Questionnaire of the Left-Behind Children, and the Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. Results show that there were significant correlations between the perceived discrimination, hope, and life satisfaction of our participants. In addition, hope significantly alleviated the negative effect of perceived discrimination on life satisfaction. We can conclude that perceived discrimination and hope both significantly predicted life satisfaction, and hope moderated the effect of perceived discrimination on life satisfaction among left-behind children in China. Our findings have implications for school teachers and social workers to help reduce left-behind children’s hurt resulting from perceived discrimination.

Author Biographies
  1. Ran Zhang, Air Force Medical University
    Department of Military Medical Psychology
  2. Luming Zhao, Peking University
    HSBC Business School
  3. Xiaochen Han, Chengdu University
    College of Teachers
  4. Shengjun Wu, Air Force Medical University
    Department of Military Medical Psychology
  5. Xufeng Liu, Air Force Medical University
    Department of Military Medical Psychology
References
Downloads
Published
2020-07-09
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.