Self-sacrificial leadership and employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior: Roles of identification with leaders and collectivism

Keywords:
unethical pro-organizational behavior, employees’ identification with leader, self-sacrificial leadership style, collectivism
Abstract

Employee behavior that is unethical but that may potentially benefit the organization is termed unethical pro-organizational behavior. Based on social identity theory, we examined the influence of a self-sacrificial leadership style on employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior, as well as the mediating effect of identification with leader and the moderating role of collectivism. Participants were 336 Chinese employees in different industries including telecommunications, manufacturing, and catering. Results show that self-sacrificial leadership was positively related to the employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior, and the positive influence was mediated by identification with leader. Additionally, collectivism moderated the relationship between self-sacrificial leadership and the employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior, such that the positive relationship between self-sacrificial leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior was stronger when collectivism was higher. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Author Biographies
  1. Jianchun Yang, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
    School of Business Administration
  2. Lu Lu, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
    School of Business Administration
  3. Nan Yao, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
    School of Business Administration
  4. Chaochao Liang, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
    School of Business Administration
References
Published
2019-10-30
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.