Validation of the Dutch Test of Conflict Handling in Chinese college students

Keywords:
Dutch Test for Conflict Handling, DUTCH, conflict, conflict handling styles, validity, Chinese college students
Abstract

There are limitations in existing conflict management instruments used in China. Therefore, we translated the Dutch Test of Conflict Handling (DUTCH), and then examined the reliability and validity of this Chinese Revised version (DUTCH-CR). Participants were 2,035 college students at 4 universities in China. We conducted exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis on data from questionnaires completed by the participants. Our findings show that the DUTCH-CR is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the handling of conflicts between Chinese college students. Further, we found that 4 conflict-handling styles are more suitable for Chinese college students. This was achieved by merging the problem-solving and compromising factors into a collaborating one, and retaining the yielding, avoiding, and forcing factors of the original DUTCH instrument.

Author Biographies
  1. Yingshan Bao, Dalian University of Technology
    Faculty of Management and Economics and Mental Health Education and Consultation Center
  2. Fangwei Zhu, Dalian University of Technology
    Faculty of Management and Economics
  3. Yue Hu, Dalian University of Technology
    Mental Health Education and Consultation Center
  4. Ning Cui, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine
    School of Marxism
  5. Yuan Gu, Dalian Maritime University
    Department of Public Management, Humanity and Arts
References
Downloads
Published
2018-08-11
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.