The measurement structure of dispositional hope: Hierarchical and bifactor models

Keywords:
hope, dispositional hope, goal achievement, measurement structure, hierarchical model, bifactor model
Abstract

Hope is a higher-order cognitive construct relating to expectations of or beliefs in wish fulfillment, which has been conceptualized as consisting of 2 components: pathways thinking (the perceived means available to individuals that allow them to achieve their goals) and agency thinking (belief in one’s ability to succeed in using the identified pathways). We aimed to clarify the measurement structure of the Chinese version of the Adult Dispositional Hope Scale, using a sample of 751 university student participants. We employed confirmatory factor analysis to compare 1-factor, 2-factor, second-order, and bifactor models. The results showed that all models fit the measured data well. However, the bifactor model had the best fit indices, whereas the second-order model was the most consistent with the theoretical measurement model. To verify that hope theory and the corresponding instruments can be confidently applied to cross-cultural samples, it is necessary to further assess their reliability and validity in a Chinese cultural context through a measurement structure analysis.

Author Biographies
  1. Zhihua Li, Hunan Agricultural University
    Department of Applied Psychology
  2. Xiayun Yin, Hunan University of Science and Technology
    Institute of Education
  3. Huilin Yang, Hunan Agricultural University
    Oriental Science and Technology College
  4. Jianxiang Tian, Hunan Agricultural University
    Further Education College
References
Downloads
Published
2017-06-10
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.