Development and validation of the Empathy Scale in Patient Care: Chinese version

Authors
  • Ya-huei Wang

    Chung Shan Medical University and Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

  • Hung-Chang Liao

    Chung Shan Medical University and Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

Keywords:
empathy, medical care, medical education, medical care professionals
Abstract

Our objective was to construct a comprehensive and psychometrically tested Chinese-language Empathy Scale in Patient Care (ES-PC) for use with Taiwanese people. We randomly selected 820 medical-care students and professionals who provided 789 valid responses to a written survey. After exploratory factor analysis, 23 items were derived, which were rated on a 9-point scale, and 3 factors were elicited: behavioral empathy (9 items; 44.73% of total variance), affective empathy (7 items; 10.99%), and intellectual empathy (7 items; 5.71%). The Cronbach’s a coefficient values for the 3 subscales and the overall scale ranged from .87 to .94, indicating internal consistency. Evidence of concurrent validity was also provided to support the external validity of the ES-PC. The test–retest correlation coefficient for the entire scale was r = .89. The findings proved that the ES-PC could be a reliable and valid instrument to measure the level of empathy in the medical cultural context of Taiwan.

Author Biographies
  1. Ya-huei Wang, Chung Shan Medical University and Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
    Department of Applied Foreign Languages, and Department of Medical Education
  2. Hung-Chang Liao, Chung Shan Medical University and Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
    Department of Health Services Administration, and Department of Medical Education
References
Downloads
Published
2016-11-19
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.