Professional autonomy, group cohesion, and job complexity affect researchers’ organizational commitment

Keywords:
professional autonomy, group cohesion, job complexity, organizational commitment
Abstract

We examined the effects of professional autonomy and group cohesion on the organizational commitment of research and development (R&D) professionals, taking into account the moderating role of job complexity in this relationship. Participants were 264 full-time researchers who each had over 5 years’ tenure at an international information technology institute in South Korea, and who completed surveys assessing their professional autonomy, group cohesion, and job complexity. The results of structural equation modeling indicated that professional autonomy, group cohesion, and job complexity positively affected organizational commitment. Moreover, job complexity had a positive moderating effect on the relationship between professional autonomy and group cohesion in connection with organizational commitment. These findings clarify the psychological attitude of R&D professionals in relation to professional autonomy, group cohesion, and job complexity.

Author Biographies
  1. Jaehwan Jung, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
    Department of Business and Technology Management
  2. Changi Nam, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
    Department of Business and Technology Management
  3. Euehun Lee, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
    Department of Business and Technology Management
  4. Seongcheol Kim, Korea University, Korea University
    School of Media and Communication
References
Downloads
Published
2016-02-23
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.