Beyond objective knowledge: The moderating role of field dependence–independence cognition in financial decision making

Authors
  • Shun-Chuan Chang

    Mackay Medical College

  • Ying-Chan Tang

    National Chiao Tung University

  • Yang-Jung Liu

    National Chiao Tung University

Keywords:
field dependence, field independence, consumers, objective knowledge, financial decision making, risk taking, cognitive style, information cues, Embedded Figures Test
Abstract

We investigated the effects of objective knowledge and information cues on consumer financial decisions, and examined the moderating effects of field dependence–independence on the decision-making process. Participants were grouped into 2 clusters, that is, field dependent or independent cognition, according to their scores on the Embedded Figures Test (EFT). We then examined how intrinsic objective knowledge and extrinsic information cues were calibrated from an investor’s cognitive ability. Results indicated that field independent participants with higher, vs. lower, scores on the EFT showed considerable superiority in acquiring information and were more risk averse. Participants with greater objective knowledge levels and prior domain expertise were also more assertive and risk prone in financial decision making than those with less objective knowledge and domain experience.

Author Biographies
  1. Shun-Chuan Chang, Mackay Medical College
    Holistic Education Center
  2. Ying-Chan Tang, National Chiao Tung University
    Institute of Business and Management
  3. Yang-Jung Liu, National Chiao Tung University
    Institute of Business and Management
References
Downloads
Published
2015-12-04
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.