Power, interactional justice, and hard influence tactics: Evidence from China and USA

Authors
Keywords:
hard influence tactics, position power, interactional justice, mistreatment, culture, power distance, work environment
Abstract

We investigated how an individual’s perception of interactional injustice interacts with a target’s position power in determining that individual’s decision to use hard influence tactics, and if this choice is influenced by the cultural factor of power distance. Our hypothesis was that China’s high-power-distance culture, in which a target is in a position in which he or she possesses a high degree of power, would deter mistreated individuals from using hard influence tactics as retaliation, whereas in the USA, where high power distance is less common, positional power would not have this effect. Participants were 415 and 311 managers, respectively, in China and the USA. Our results supported the hypotheses, suggesting that the cultural factor of power distance is a deciding factor in people’s consideration of whether or not to use hard influence tactics in reaction to the mistreatment from targets who hold a high degree of position power.

Author Biographies
  1. Yingchun Wang, University of Houston Downtown

    College of Business

  2. Baiyin Yang, Tsinghua University

    Department of Human Resources and Organizational Behavior

References
Downloads
Published
2016-04-02
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.