Undergraduates’ day-to-day lying behaviors: Implications, targets, and psychological characteristics

Authors
  • Su-Lin Chiu

    Taipei College of Maritime Technology

  • Fu-Yuan Hong

    Da-Yeh University

  • Shao-I Chiu

    Da-Yeh University

Keywords:
lying behavior, psychological characteristics, cheating, undergraduate students, scale development
Abstract

We analyzed undergraduates’ (N = 232) day-to-day lying behavior in order to explore the frequency of occurrence, kinds of lying behavior, and gender differences, and to analyze the relationship between lying behaviors and individual undergraduates’ psychological characteristics. We developed a questionnaire and analyzed the results using descriptive statistics, t tests, and Pearson product-moment correlation analysis. Results showed that the undergraduates’ day-to-day behavior could be divided into the following 5 types of lying: excuse, absenteeism, cheating, negative, and spending. More than 80% of the undergraduates said they had told a lie in a day-to-day situation within the 1-year period covered in this study. There was no significant gender difference in any aspect of the undergraduates’ day-to-day lying behavior, although there was a significant correlation between day-to-day lying behavior and negative psychological characteristics.

Author Biographies
  1. Su-Lin Chiu, Taipei College of Maritime Technology
    Center for General Education
  2. Fu-Yuan Hong, Da-Yeh University
    Graduate Institute of Professional Development in Education
  3. Shao-I Chiu, Da-Yeh University
    Graduate Institute of Professional Development in Education
References
Downloads
Published
2015-09-29
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.