Cross-cultural comparison of USA and South Korea in estimated rate of organ donation

Keywords:
false consensus, organ donation, cross-cultural research, South Korea, USA
Abstract

In this study, we examined cultural differences in estimation of both the percentage of people who would donate organs to others when they died and the percentage of people who would discuss their decision to donate organs with their parents. Participants were 79 undergraduates at a Midwestern university in the USA and 116 undergraduates at a university in Seoul, Republic of Korea. Results showed that the South Korean participants exhibited a greater false consensus effect in regard to discussion with parents about organ donation than did the group from North America. Among those not willing to donate organs, the underestimation of the South Koreans was greater than that the North Americans regarding the willingness of others to discuss donation with their parents. These findings imply that campaigns promoting organ donation may need to be targeted at correcting people’s misperceptions about relative prevalence of organ-donation-related behaviors, thereby motivating people to sign up for organ donation, and encouraging discussion by donors with their parents.

Author Biographies
  1. Hee Sun Park, Korea University, Korea University
    Media School
  2. Doshik Yun, Michigan State University
    Department of Communication
  3. Ju Yeon Oh, Inha University
    Department of Business Administration
  4. Chang-Ik Song, Korea University, Korea University
    Department of Physical Education
References
Downloads
Published
2015-06-13
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.