Ethical leadership and followers' attitudes toward corporate social responsibility: The role of perceived ethical work climate

Keywords:
corporate social responsibility, ethical leadership, perceived ethical work climate, organizational effectiveness, Korean employees
Abstract

Increasing attention is being paid to how leaders influence followers’ perceptions of the importance of ethics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) for organizational effectiveness. However, few researchers have conducted empirical investigations into the impact of leadership style on followers’ attitudes toward CSR. In this study, participants comprised 313 employees of 5 large financial and banking service firms in Korea. Results indicated that ethical leadership was strongly associated with followers’ rating of CSR. In addition, we examined how employees’ perception of ethical work climate mediates and moderates the relationship between ethical leadership and followers’ attitudes toward CSR. Our findings supported a positive link between ethical leadership and followers’ attitudes toward CSR, with perception of an ethical work climate acting as a significant mediator and moderator in this relationship. Implications for leadership practice and CSR, and recom- mendations for future research directions are discussed.

Author Biographies
  1. Suk Bong Choi, Korea University, Korea University
    College of Business and Economics
  2. S. M. Ebrahim Ullah, Samsung Research and Development Institute Bangladesh Ltd.
    Department of Human Resources
  3. Won Jun Kwak, Soongsil University

    Department of Business Administration

References
Downloads
Published
2014-11-27
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.