Validation of a forced-choice emotional intelligence scale with Chinese nurses

Authors
  • Yefei Wang

    The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, and Hunan University of Chinese Medicine

  • Guangrong Xie

    The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University

  • Jin Tang

    Hunan University of Chinese Medicine

  • Xinhua Liu

    The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South university

  • Bin Zhang

    Hunan University of Chinese Medicine

Keywords:
emotional intelligence, Chinese nurses, Wong's Emotional Intelligence Scale
Abstract

We evaluated the reliability and validity of Wong’s Emotional Intelligence Scale (WEIS) – a forced-choice emotional intelligence scale – with a sample of 271 Chinese nurses employed at 2 large hospitals in the Hunan Province of China. The results demonstrated that the WEIS did not fit a 4-factor structure and the scale had acceptable reliability and convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. Although our results in this study support the practical utility of the WEIS with Chinese nurses, our results suggest the need for further validation of the WEIS.

Author Biographies
  1. Yefei Wang, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, and Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
    Department of Psychiatry, and Department of Applied Psychology
  2. Guangrong Xie, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
    Department of Psychiatry
  3. Jin Tang, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
    Department of Applied Psychology
  4. Xinhua Liu, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South university
    Department of Psychiatry
  5. Bin Zhang, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
    Department of Applied Psychology
References
Downloads
Published
2014-09-24
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.