Relationships among teacher support, peer conflict resolution, and school emotional experiences in adolescents from Shanghai

Keywords:
teacher support, peer conflict resolution, school emotional experiences, secondary school students
Abstract

We investigated the relationships among teacher support, peer conflict resolution, and emotional experiences at school in 2,782 students from 12 secondary schools in Shanghai, China. The results demonstrated that: a) most of the students had positive perceptions of teacher support, effective peer conflict resolution, happiness, and communication satisfaction in school context; b) males used more negative peer conflict resolution strategies than did females; c) in all school experiences, significant differences were found between students in different grade levels; and d) teacher support was found to have a positive influence on student happiness, satisfaction, and peer conflict resolution, and effective peer conflict resolution also had a positive influence on student happiness and satisfaction, but negative emotion was found to reduce happiness and satisfaction.

Author Biographies
  1. Li-Jun Wang, Zhejiang Normal University
    Department of Psychology
  2. Wen-Chung Wang, Hong Kong Institute of Education
    Department of Psychological Studies
  3. Hai-Gen Gu, Shanghai Normal University

    Department of Psychology, College of Education

  4. Pei-Da Zhan, Zhejiang Normal University

    Department of Psychology, College of Teacher Education

  5. Xin-Xiao Yang, Zhejiang Normal University

    Department of Education, College of Teacher Education

  6. Julian Barnard, JB Associates, Warwick
    Education Consultant
References
Downloads
Published
2013-11-30
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.