Perceived stress, stressors, and mental distress among Doctor of Pharmacy students

Authors
  • Gemma P. Geslani

    St. Louis College of Pharmacy

  • Claude J. Gaebelein

    St. Louis College of Pharmacy

Keywords:
perceived stress, stressors, mental distress, Doctor of Pharmacy students, coping strategies, mental health
Abstract

We conducted an online survey to assess stress levels, stressors, coping strategies, and mental distress among first year professional Doctor of Pharmacy students at St. Louis College of Pharmacy. We used the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS10) to measure perceived stress and the Health-related Quality of Life Scale (HRQOL-14) to assess physical and mental health. Self-reported stress levels among our respondents were elevated, significantly higher than among other populations as reported in previous studies, and exceeded the threshold benchmarked as being unhealthy. Mental health scores were negatively correlated with stress levels, exceeded the threshold for frequent mental distress, and were significantly higher than in comparison groups as reported in previous studies. Examinations were ranked the most stressful events and spending time with family ranked as the most effective stress reliever. Further specific investigation is needed to identify probable contributors to distress and to solicit recommendations to help students alleviate their stress and strengthen their mental health.

Author Biographies
  1. Gemma P. Geslani, St. Louis College of Pharmacy
    Division of Basic and Pharmaceutical Sciences
  2. Claude J. Gaebelein, St. Louis College of Pharmacy

    Division of Basic and Pharmaceutical Sciences

References
Downloads
Published
2013-07-30
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.