Spontaneous self-concept among Chinese undergraduates in Hong Kong

Authors
  • Marie Lam

    The University of Hong Kong

  • Godfrey Chan

    The University of Hong Kong

  • Marcus M. Marcet

    The University of Hong Kong

  • Wilfred Wong

    The University of Hong Kong

  • James Wong

    The University of Hong Kong

  • David Wong

    The University of Hong Kong

Keywords:
Twenty Statements Test, spontaneous self-concept, Chinese undergraduates, American college students, cross-cultural differences, individualism-collectivism
Abstract

We explored spontaneous self-concept among 227 Chinese undergraduates at a university in Hong Kong. Participants’ responses to the Twenty Statements Test (TST) were compared with those of North American college students from the 1950s to the 2000s. The results showed that only 13.7% of the Chinese students described themselves in terms of social roles, status, or group membership. In contrast, 84.6% perceived themselves in terms of personality traits, behaviors, and emotion. Our findings suggest that Chinese undergraduates in Hong Kong are no less individualistic than their American counterparts. Moreover, the individualism– collectivism cultural dimension may not be useful in distinguishing North American students from those in Hong Kong.

Author Biographies
  1. Marie Lam, The University of Hong Kong
    Department of Ophthalmology
  2. Godfrey Chan, The University of Hong Kong
    Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
  3. Marcus M. Marcet, The University of Hong Kong
    Department of Ophthalmology
  4. Wilfred Wong, The University of Hong Kong
    Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
  5. James Wong, The University of Hong Kong
    Department of Ophthalmology
  6. David Wong, The University of Hong Kong

    Department of Ophthalmology

References
Downloads
Published
2014-08-14
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.