Temporal stability of the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 among Irish college students over four weeks

Keywords:
Brief Symptom Inventory 18, depression, anxiety, somatization, Irish college students
Abstract

Of the currently limited available data on the mental health of students in Ireland the most notable are provided in the College Lifestyle and Attitudinal National (CLAN) Survey (Hope, Dring, & Dring, 2005). Recently, Houghton et al. (2012) found among students at an Irish university that women reported significantly higher levels of symptomatology than men on each of the three 6-item subscales of the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI 18; Derogatis, 2001) (anxiety, depression, and somatization) and the Global Severity Index (GSI; summed total of the 18 items). Similarly, final-year students had significantly worse mental health than non-final-year students. Internal reliability, construct validity, and factor structure of the BSI 18, were reported but no data on the test-retest reliability of the measure. Our aim was to supplement these findings by reporting on the test-retest reliability of the BSI 18 in a small sample of Irish college students.

Author Biographies
  1. Frank Houghton, Limerick Institute of Technology
    Department of Humanities
  2. Noreen Keane, Limerick Institute of Technology
    Department of Humanities
  3. Christopher Alan Lewis, Glyndwr University
    Professor of Psychology,  Dean of Institute for Health, Medical Sciences and Society
  4. Niamh Murphy, Limerick Institute of Technology
    Department of Humanities
  5. Sharon Houghton, University of Limerick
    Department of Education and Professional Studies
  6. Claire Dunne, University College Cork
    PASS Coordinator (Peer Support)
References
Downloads
Published
2012-10-12
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.