Repeating “Yes” in a first request and compliance with a later request: The four walls technique

Authors
  • Nicolas Guéguen

    University of South Brittany

  • Robert-Vincent Joule

    University of Provence

  • Didier Courbert

    University of Provence

  • Séverine Halimi-Falkowicz

    University of Provence

  • Marie Marchand

    University of Provence

Keywords:
compliance, four walls technique, behavioral consistency, foot-in-the-door technique
Abstract

The commitment/consistency principle for compliance implies that people act in ways consistent with their previous behavior. Cialdini and Sagarin (2005) have stated that, according to this principle, asking individuals questions to which they would be expected to say “yes” could be associated with achieving greater compliance with a subsequent request. However, this procedure, referred to as the four walls technique, has never been tested experimentally. In this study, we conducted an experiment in which participants were first asked to answer several questions that required “yes” or “no” responses. Then, the participants were asked to comply with an additional request. It was found that saying “yes” several times beforehand is associated with greater compliance with a subsequent request than is saying “no” beforehand or when no first request was made.

Author Biographies
  1. Nicolas Guéguen, University of South Brittany
    Department of Social Sciences
  2. Robert-Vincent Joule, University of Provence
    Department of Social Psychology
  3. Didier Courbert, University of Provence
    Department of Social Psychology
  4. Séverine Halimi-Falkowicz, University of Provence
    Department of Social Psychology
  5. Marie Marchand, University of Provence
    Department of Social Psychology
References
Downloads
Published
2012-06-25
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.