An analysis of personality traits of Chinese military medical peacekeepers in Lebanon

Keywords:
personality traits, Chinese medical peacekeepers, 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire
Abstract

In this study the Chinese version of the 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF; Cattell, Eber, & Tatsuoka, 1970; Dai & Zhu, 1988) was used to investigate the personality traits of 59 Chinese medical peacekeepers in Lebanon. Survey data were compared among 59 peacekeepers, 62 military personnel (control group 1), and 58 medical workers (control group 2). The social boldness, and abstractedness scores of peacekeepers were significantly lower than those of the military and medical worker groups. A secondary factor analysis of the 16PF revealed that the cowardice/decision scores of the peacekeeper group were between the scores of the other 2 groups. The peacekeepers showed lower warmth, social boldness, and abstractedness and higher self-reliance in personality traits. The results suggest that for future peacekeeping missions psychological personality selection should be conducted to recruit military personnel with higher scores of warmth and lower scores for self-reliance.

Author Biographies
  1. Ke Yu, Chengdu Military General Hospital
    Department of Neurology
  2. Yan Zhang, Chengdu Military General Hospital
    Department of Cardiology
  3. Congyang Li, Chengdu Military General Hospital
    Department of Neurology
  4. Qingsong Wang, Chengdu Military General Hospital
    Department of Neurology
  5. Yingjun Tan, Chengdu Military General Hospital
    Department of Medical Affairs
  6. Yongcong Shao, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Science
    Academy of Military Medical Sciences
References
Downloads
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.