The validity and reliability of the revised Chinese version of the Situational Self-Awareness Scale
- Authors
-
-
Xufeng Liu
Fourth Military Medical University
-
Yong-Cong Shao
Fourth Military Medical University
-
Yebing Yang
Fourth Military Medical University
-
Shengjun Wu
Fourth Military Medical University
-
Hai Yang
Fourth Military Medical University
-
Wei Wang
Fourth Military Medical University
-
Wei Xiao
Fourth Military Medical University
-
- Keywords:
- situation, self-awareness, validity, reliability, China, Situational Self-Awareness Scale
- Abstract
-
In this study a Chinese version of the Situational Self-Awareness Scale (SSAS; Govern & Marsch, 2001) was developed and tested for validity and reliability. Participants were 1,244 undergraduate students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and other statistical methods yielded results indicating a good correlation of items in the Chinese (C-SSAS) and English version of the scale. When private self-awareness was assessed in a private setting the score of participants was significantly greater and likewise the public self-awareness scores were higher when the scale was completed in a public setting. Test-retest reliability was significant across situations and time. The reallocation of one item to public self-awareness in the C-SSAS from private in the SSAS was indicative of differences between Eastern and Western cultures and this is discussed. In general, the results indicated that the Chinese version of the SSAS has good reliability and validity. The scale should, therefore, be suitable as a reference to develop scales for evaluating personnel working in specific occupations.
- References
- Downloads
- Published
- 2009-07-01
- Issue
- Volume 37, 2009, Issue 6
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.
Disclaimer
Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.