Black jurors' personality trait attribution to a rape case defendant

Keywords:
rape case, defendant, personality trait attributions, black jurors, jury
Abstract
In the present study the effect of racial dissimilarity on the evaluative attitude of 186 male and female black participants was investigated. Participants took part in a simulated jury experiment in which the race of the victim, the race of the defendant, and the amount of evidence against the defendant varied. The participants read transcripts of either an interracial or an intraracial forcible rape case against the defendant and then evaluated the defendant on certain trait dimensions. The results indicated that the racial similarity of the defendant and/or the victim to the participant jurors influenced the level of negative traits attributed to the defendant. The results strongly indicated that prejudicial social evaluation of the outgroup is a 2-sided phenomenon. The interaction effects observed in the study seemed to indicate that factors such as the context under which the evaluative behavior took place, sex affiliation, the victim’s race, and the level of evidence tended to influence trait attribution to a dissimilar other. These results were discussed in the context of prejudicial trait attribution to a dissimilar defendant and the possible effects of such attitude on jury decision-making.
References
Downloads
Published
1976-08-01
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.