Exploring the adoption of social robots: Influences of promotion focus, anthropomorphism, and monetary sacrifice

Authors
  • Hyeon Jo

    Headquarters, HJ Institute of Technology and Management

  • Do-Hyung Park

    Graduate School of Business Information Technology, Kookmin University

Keywords:
social robots, user acceptance, regulatory focus, anthropomorphism, monetary sacrifice
Abstract

Amid the rapid advancement of technology, social robots are increasingly becoming a part of human society. This study explored the associations between promotion focus, prevention focus, anthropomorphism, facial expression, monetary sacrifice, and overall attitudes with users’ intention to use social robots. We employed a survey-based design and analyzed data from 300 adult users through partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results showed significant associations of promotion focus, anthropomorphism, monetary sacrifice, and overall attitude with the intention to use social robots. Notably, monetary sacrifice was associated with a positive perception, indicating that higher costs might be seen as an indicator of superior quality and advanced technology. Conversely, prevention focus and facial expression did not show significant associations with the intention to use social robots. These findings provide useful guidelines for product developers and marketers in social robotics who want to appeal to consumers while optimizing both time and cost.

References
Published
2024-09-04
Section
Articles
License

Copyright (c) 2024 Social Behavior and Personality

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.