Primary school teachers’ perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: The mediating role of collective efficacy

Authors
  • Caixia Zhu

    Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University

  • Minghe Xia

    School of Information Science and Technology, Hangzhou Normal University

  • Heng Xie

    College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh

  • Yushi Wang

    Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University

  • Jiahua Ye

    School of Teacher Education, Hangzhou Normal University

  • Jie Xu

    Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University

Keywords:
job satisfaction, perceived organizational support, collective efficacy, primary school teachers
Abstract

We examined how perceived organizational support and collective efficacy affect the job satisfaction of primary school teachers in China, and explored whether collective efficacy mediates the relationship between perceived organizational support and job satisfaction. We gathered data from 245 teachers using the Job Diagnostic Survey, the Organizational Support Measurement Scale, and the Collective Teacher Efficacy Scale. Our results confirmed there were positive correlations between job satisfaction and perceived organizational support, and between job satisfaction and teachers’ collective efficacy, supporting our initial hypotheses. Notably, perceived organizational support directly influenced teachers’ job satisfaction and also indirectly influenced their job satisfaction through collective efficacy, highlighting the potential for future research to explore strategies that enhance both organizational support and collective efficacy, ultimately ensuring teachers find satisfaction in their job.

References
Published
2024-02-07
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.