Perceived freedom, accident severity and empathic value as determinants of the attribution of responsibility
- Authors
-
-
James M. Gleason
State University of New York at Buffalo
-
Victor A. Harris
Niagara Falls Community Mental Health Center
-
- Keywords:
- perceived freedom, accident severity, empathic value, determinants, attribution of responsibility
- Abstract
- The effects of severity of an accident, perceived freedom of the perpetrator, and empathic value of the victim were examined in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design. N = 192 participants read detailed accident scenarios and then made judgments as to the responsibility of each of a number of plausibly responsible agents. In line with the hypotheses, participants attributed more responsibility to the perpetrator under high severity than low severity conditions, and more responsibility under high than low perceived freedom. The hypothesis that more responsibility would be attributed to the perpetrator when the victim was human than when the victim was a dog was not supported. Additionally, there was no clear evidence for victim derogation. The implications of these findings for defensive attribution and just world hypotheses as well as for methodological issues are discussed.
- References
- Downloads
- Published
- 1976-08-01
- Issue
- Volume 4, 1976, Issue 2
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.
Disclaimer
Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.