Longitudinal associations among relative deprivation, maladaptive cognition, and internet addiction: A four-wave study

Authors
  • Hui Guo

    Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment Toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University

  • Yuetian Ma

    Department of Marxism, Shandong Normal University

  • Shuchang Chen

    Department of Clinical Medicine, Jining Medical College

  • Yanfang Li

    Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment Toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University

  • Yu Tian

    Department of State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University

Keywords:
maladaptive cognition, relative deprivation, internet addiction, longitudinal association
Abstract

We investigated the longitudinal associations among relative deprivation, maladaptive cognition, and internet addiction in Chinese university students. We gave 912 university students assessments at four time points (every 6 months) over the first 2 years of their enrollment at college. Cross-lagged panel analysis revealed the presence of positive correlations among relative deprivation, maladaptive cognition, and internet addiction. Moreover, these associations were dynamic and bidirectional across the four time points. Furthermore, maladaptive cognition played a bidirectional mediating role in the association between relative deprivation and internet addiction across the time points. Relative deprivation and internet addiction appeared to generate a positive feedback loop, which formed a vicious cycle. The exaggeration of the advantages of using the internet may lead to internet addiction, while an exaggeration of one’s supposedly disadvantaged circumstances may lead to increased relative deprivation.

References
Published
2024-03-06
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.