The relationships between peer victimization, hostile attribution bias, and revenge: A latent profile analysis

Authors
  • Xu-Yan Zhao

    School of Educational Science, and Institute for Education and Treatment of Problematic Youth, Ludong University, and Basic Courses Teaching and Research Development, Yingkou Institute of Technology

  • Shujie Zheng

    School of Educational Science, and Institute for Education and Treatment of Problematic Youth, Ludong University

  • Zhenpeng Wang

    Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University

Keywords:
peer victimization, revenge, hostile attribution bias, latent profile analysis
Abstract

We explored possible patterns of peer victimization among middle school and high school students using latent profile analysis, and evaluated latent class differences in demographic characteristics and their associations with hostile attribution bias and revenge. We collected self-report questionnaire data from 14,271 Chinese middle school (grades 6–8) and high school (grades 9–11) students across 43 schools located in five provinces and autonomous regions. The results indicated that there were three latent classes of peer victimization with similar profile characteristics for middle school and high school students: the non/low-victimized class, the moderately victimized class, and the highly victimized class. The frequency of peer victimization was higher for students in the 8th and 10th grades than for those in the 11th grade. Boarding school students and left-behind students were more vulnerable to peer victimization. The more serious the peer victimization suffered by adolescents, the higher was their hostile attribution bias and desire for revenge.

References
Published
2023-10-04
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.