Process of change, self-efficacy, decisional balance, and stage of change of physical activity in children: A meta-analysis

Authors
  • Yu Tie

    School of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University

  • Wen Tian

    School of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University

  • Yiru Chen

    School of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University

  • Guoqing Zang

    School of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University

  • Peng Shi

    School of Physical Education, Shanghai University of Sport

  • Xiaosu Feng

    School of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University

Keywords:
transtheoretical model, physical activity, stage of change, process of change, self-efficacy, decisional balance, children, adolescents
Abstract

Research findings on the application of the transtheoretical model (TTM) to physical activity in children and adolescents have been inconsistent, indicating that the relationships between structural elements in the TTM are unclear. We conducted a database search to collect TTM-based cross-sectional studies and used a meta-analysis to explore the relationships between processes of change (POC), self-efficacy (SEI), decisional balance (DBL), and stages of change in children and adolescents. Meta-analysis results of 16 articles showed that physical activity stage changes in children and adolescents were associated with POC, SEI, and DBL, and that POC, SEI, and DBL had distinct stage characteristics. Thus, POC, SEI, and DBL differ in the extent to which they play a role in adjacent stage transitions in the physical activity of children and adolescents. We recommend that stage-matched intervention strategies be developed based on key elements of adjacent stage transitions.

References
Published
2023-03-02
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.