Authoritarian, benevolent, and moral components of paternalistic leadership and employee performance: Psychological safety as a mediator
- Authors
-
-
Yulong Tu
School of Social and Public Administration, Lingnan Normal University
-
Shaojie Wang
School of Business, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology
-
Lei Lu
School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology
-
- Keywords:
- paternalistic leadership, benevolent leadership, authoritarian leadership, task performance, psychological safety, organizational citizenship behavior
- Abstract
-
We adopted conservation of resources theory to examine how the authoritarian leadership component of paternalistic leadership interacts with two other dimensions: benevolent leadership and moral leadership, to jointly influence employee performance through psychological safety. We conducted a survey with 417 supervisor–subordinate dyads employed in a variety of industries in Guangdong Province, China. Results showed that paternalistic leadership mediated the negative relationship between the authoritarian leadership component and employees’ task performance, organizational citizenship behavior toward individuals, and organizational citizenship behavior toward the organization. Further, the indirect effect of the authoritarian leadership component through employees’ perceived psychological safety on their task performance and organizational citizenship behavior toward the organization was moderated by the benevolent leadership component. The findings in this study further understanding of how paternalistic leadership affects employee performance.
- References
- Downloads
- Published
- 2023-03-02
- Issue
- Vol. 51 No. 3 (2023)
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.
Disclaimer
Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.