Mental fatigue increases utilitarian moral judgments during COVID-19

Authors
  • Mufan Zheng

    Department of Psychology, Wuhan University

  • Hongyi Li

    Department of Psychology, Wuhan University

  • Bicheng Gao

    Department of Psychology, Wuhan University

Keywords:
mental fatigue, moral judgment, social support, COVID-19, deontology, utilitarianism
Abstract

This research investigated how mental fatigue is associated with moral judgments during the COVID-19 pandemic and studied the moderating effect of social support. We used self-report questionnaires to collect data from 4,042 people. We assessed people’s mental fatigue and social support during the pandemic, and designed nine moral dilemmas based on the background of COVID-19 to measure people’s moral judgments. The results showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic mental fatigue had a significant impact on moral judgments. Individuals with higher mental fatigue were more likely to make more utilitarian choices, while social support moderated the relationship between mental fatigue and moral judgments. When experiencing mental fatigue, individuals with low, compared to high, social support are more likely to rely on utilitarianism to make moral judgments.

References
Published
2023-03-02
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.