Knowledge network capability and organizational innovation: Network position transition and ambidextrous innovative behaviors as mediators

Authors
Keywords:
knowledge network capability, network position transition, ambidextrous innovation behavior, knowledge base, organizational innovation
Abstract

In this study we examined the influence of knowledge network capability on organizational innovation. Drawing on organizational network theory and taking a knowledge-based view, we proposed ambidextrous innovation behavior and network position transition as mediators to clarify the underlying mechanisms of the effect of knowledge network capability on organizational innovation. Furthermore, we proposed knowledge base as a boundary variable to understand its interplay with knowledge network capability in regard to organizational innovation. Participants were 265 senior managers of recently established high-tech enterprises in China. Consistent with our predictions, the results show there was a positive relationship between knowledge network capability and ambidextrous innovation behavior, and network position transition mediated this relationship. In addition, the results suggest that knowledge base can strengthen the direct effect of knowledge network capability on organizational innovation. Our findings enrich the literature on knowledge networks and innovation, and provide important implications for enterprises to innovate by employing knowledge network capability.

Author Biographies
  1. Xing Tong, Tongji University
    School of Economics and Management
  2. Xiaomeng Han, Shandong Administration Institute
    Communist Party of China Shandong Provincial Party School
References
Published
2021-06-24
Section
Articles
License

Author(s) agree that copyright of an article published in SBP Journal is transferred from the author(s) to the journal publisher (Scientific Journal Publishers Limited) upon publication.

Disclaimer

Social Behavior and Personality maintains an open editorial policy and may or may not endorse the conclusions made in its published articles. Neither the journal nor its publisher, editors or staff assume any responsibility for any material considered to be offensive or defamatory, or for obtaining any copyright permissions necessary for publication of articles.